Last
month, a Washington Post op-ed piece
argued that food production, distribution, and consumption represent the largest
sector of the U.S. economy, yet come under no national plan or single official. “Government policy in these areas
is made piecemeal,” the authors wrote. “Diet-related chronic disease, food
safety, marketing to children, labor conditions, wages for farm and food-chain
workers, immigration, water and air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and
support for farmers: These issues are all connected to the food system. Yet
they are overseen by eight federal agencies. Amid this incoherence, special
interests thrive and the public good suffers.” The op-ed’s authors called on
President Obama to state a national policy that balances public health values
against agricultural interests—paying attention to food safety, price
transparency, worker protections, children’s health, animal welfare and climate
resiliency—and create a White House council to ensure federal agencies are not
working at cross-purposes. Some, though, would argue that what’s needed isn’t just a
national food policy to articulate change, but a national food agency to make
it happen.
Source: National
Geographic, 12/12/14, Food
Policy
No comments:
Post a Comment